your response suggests that you think that the list needs to be 100% consistent with the shape of reality at all times, but the reality of it is that standards

your response suggests that you think that the list needs to be 100% consistent with the shape of reality at all times, but the reality of it is that standards are fluid things and they are developed and honed iteratively in response to the pressures that gave rise to their existence in the first place. it's less about trying to make sure to accommodate every last possibility, and more about making sure to provide a reasonably fundamental and useful set of resources that can be used in union to build the more complex ones. the map of absolute choices is not the terrain of contextual variation and nuance, and there's no reason to ever expect a 100% concordance because a 1:1 map is basically equivalent to directly experiencing noumena and seeing past qualia, and that's just not usually a thing that is, by definition, directly apprehended, but rather indirectly inferred from the phenomena that result from interpreting it. tl;dr they'll get it in the next patch