3 ms·

I don't think you have that quite right. Objects don't inherit from other objects in Python — you can't do `class Foo(object())`, for example. Python has class-

• mjburgess 5y ago
  classes are objects, and inheritance is just the __mro__ on a class -- ie., its prototypal chain if you want to inherit from an object, just construct a class object from it using type(). Eg., at least, for any given object `me`, type('ChildOfMe', (type(me),), vars(me)) But if you wanted a more literal dispatch to `me` you could create a proxy class which dispatched to a reference to `me`. type('ChildOfMe', (proxyclass(me),), {}) Where `proxyclass` is a function of the form, def proxyclass(obj): class Proxy: ... dispatch to obj ... return Proxy
  • chc 5y ago
    "If you want to inherit from an object, just create a class based on that object" is a description of how you'd imitate prototype inheritance in a language that only has class-based inheritance. It does not mean you're actually looking at a prototype-based language, and in fact strongly suggests the opposite. You can't get inheritance in Python without engaging with the class system. I suppose you could just say that classes are a particularly restricted sort of prototypes, and thus any class-based language is effectively prototype-based. But at that point "<OOP language> has prototype inheritance" is just tautological based on the set of definitions you've chosen.
    • mjburgess 5y ago
      It's not tautological. I don't think C#, C++, Java, etc. can have classes proxy for objects. Classes there aren't objects. You cannot write "return NewClass". Python is prototypal in just the same way js is: inheritance is a daisy-chain of references between objects. JS is "maximally prototypal" if you like, where any object may be refernced. In python, only objects of type "type": but that isn't a big restriction, as shown.