3 ms·
Yeah, if only the organization meant to give accurate epidemiology information hadn't first denied airborne transmission, then denied mask efficacy, and then es
by goldenkey 5y ago
Yeah, if only the organization meant to give accurate epidemiology information hadn't first denied airborne transmission, then denied mask efficacy, and then espoused 6 feet distance bullshido.
From the speed of spread of covid, it was clear that it was airborne. I don't need a PHD in epidemiology to not mislead the public.