5 ms·
This is a straight up sexist remark. If part of the job is showing respect to all your coworkers, regardless of sex, then it seems obvious he is incapable. Ma
by readonthegoapp 5y ago
This is a straight up sexist remark.
If part of the job is showing respect to all your coworkers, regardless of sex, then it seems obvious he is incapable.
Maybe his beliefs do not translate at all into his behavior, but I doubt it.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoHow so? Is it racist too? Please help me out here. I am trying to be reasonable about it, but the reaction to my simple statement created ridiculous level of response I did not expect so I expect to defend it. I repeat. The only thing that matters is whether this person can do their job. How does that make me sexist?
- kazinator 5y agoYour position is illogical. The question "can this person do the job" can be a resounding, objective "yes", for someone who, say, also happens to embezzle cash from the company. If that's the "only thing that matters", then the thief should keep the job and continue stealing. Especially if you want to defend some unpopular position, you have make sure you don't have logical holes in it, like universal absolutes that succumb to easy counterexamples.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoNo. Can the person do the job includes their obvious drawbacks ( like tendency to steal ). I do not consider writing a book, however salacious and 'wrong' it may be, to be in that particular category. The guy is an asshole, but it is hard to argue he does not know what he is doing.
- klyrs 5y agoIf he wrote a book on how to embezzle from companies, would that be 'wrong' enough for you? Do you realize that the Civil Rights Act is also a law that companies have an interest in their employees not breaking?
- loopz 5y agoThe guy seems clueless how he affects people he manage, so is unfit for the job. He sounds like a 0.1x employee.