Please read again. You do not understand the risks where one does not pro-actively protect one self. Please note 'attractive nuisance' and 'calculus of neglige

Please read again. You do not understand the risks where one does not pro-actively protect one self. Please note 'attractive nuisance' and 'calculus of negligence'. For a claimant's lawyer to be successful in California; that is, a settlement without going to trial, all they have to do is file a tort based on one or both of these two. Based on on my insurance agent and my legal counsel, I had no choice to pursue the criminal prosecutorial path or my lawyer and insurance carrier would be legally allowed to walk away from me. So I chose my family's livelihood over the kid. Your analysis was shallow and has no bearing on the legal reality of my world. If that is not how your world works, than good for you.