3 ms·
Why not? Are they not bailed out indirectly?
by endisneigh 6y ago
Why not? Are they not bailed out indirectly?
- eloff 6y agoNo. That's not taxpayer money anymore. If you buy a car at a dealership and they take that money and donate it to ISIS, did you just support terrorism? No, the dealer did. You only bought a car.
- endisneigh 6y agoWe'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Personally, if I give you a dollar and you give that dollar to someone else, I'd say that I had indirectly given the final person a dollar.
- eloff 6y agoIt's indirect. So that doesn't make it a bailout anymore.
- endisneigh 6y agoThat's not what bailout means... The direct or indirectness of the money flow is unrelated to whether or not something is a bailout.
- eloff 6y agoA bailout is a discrete event. It happened, it's over. Citadel still exists as a company thanks to the AG bailout. That does not mean everything citadel ever buys is now a government bailout. That's just silly.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]