3 ms·
Hopefully the city was wise enough to not sign a monopoly agreement with Charter--my city owns our own poles and it allowed us to let in a small fiber ISP who's
by a2tech 5y ago
Hopefully the city was wise enough to not sign a monopoly agreement with Charter--my city owns our own poles and it allowed us to let in a small fiber ISP who's competing with ATT and Comcast (and I think winning handily). 1gpbs symmetrical Internet access for ~50USD/month. No caps.
- rayiner 5y agoThere's no such thing as a "monopoly agreement." Monopoly franchise agreements are banned under federal law. If you read one you'll see a provision that makes clear it's "non-exclusive." Providers end up with de facto monopolies for two reasons: 1) Many places (like the one here) are marginal in terms of whether it's worth building anything at all. A second provider coming in is unattractive. 2) What's legal is build-out requirements, which force a provider to serve every (or nearly every) home in a town. That torpedos competition except in the largest cities, because a second provider can't just wire up the areas where it makes sense to overbuild.