4 ms·

> You can't say it's the better tool in this case when it makes no attempt to compete with that feature Sure I can. Something isn't better just because it has

> You can't say it's the better tool in this case when it makes no attempt to compete with that feature Sure I can. Something isn't better just because it has more features. Easy ability to be spammed with nothing more than a widely shared string ID is not a positive feature. Even if I used FB auth to log into all of my various internet accounts, my Messenger still won't get spammed. It's a better tool (at least for me). My email inbox just annoys me while Messenger is so good I haven't deleted my FB account.

vlunkr 5y ago
> Something isn't better just because it has more features You're right, but being able to be spammed with a string ID absolutely is a positive feature. While your inbox may annoy you, I'm sure you also use to sign up for services, get marketing info that you're interested in, get billing notifications, etc. Could Messenger do all that? Yeah potentially, but now you've just moved the spam problem into Messenger. That's why I'm saying Messenger isn't the better tool because it doesn't have spam, it doesn't have spam because it lacks the features that introduce spam.