>a more intelligent person is inherently superior I also disagree with this statement. >a "more intelligent" person is defined as "having more consciousness"

>a more intelligent person is inherently superior I also disagree with this statement. >a "more intelligent" person is defined as "having more consciousness" which, in a system that ascribes value to humanity and consciousness, is equivalent to saying that a more intelligent person is "more of a person", and therefore inherently "superior in value" This is what I meant. Do you still disagree with this statement? And, well... should I make my posts more detailed or less, considering they fail to communicate the idea? Or should I go back to just saying nothing?