2 ms·
My point was to inject some nuance so we could discuss the tradeoffs, rather than your one-sided comment that is a conversation ender. At no point did I attemp
by edmundsauto 5y ago
My point was to inject some nuance so we could discuss the tradeoffs, rather than your one-sided comment that is a conversation ender. At no point did I attempt to balance the scales to reduce the situation to a good/bad emotional response. It appears that is your objective, which isn't a very interesting way to spend time. Have a nice day.
- johnklos 5y agoYou say, "but they do good things". I write back with a link to a list of evil things they've done and are doing, and you don't address that one tiny bit. So you want to say they're wonderful, but can't talk about what they're doing wrong. I want to say they're horrible, and at least I've provided content. Introducing nuance? Sure... More like another example of pro-Cloudflare fanboism.