2 ms·
It's the equivalent of all the landlords in a city enforcing a 10pm noise rule, and it sucks. This seems like a fairly obvious flaw in your argument -- if nonc
by byrneseyeview 18y ago
It's the equivalent of all the landlords in a city enforcing a 10pm noise rule, and it sucks.
This seems like a fairly obvious flaw in your argument -- if noncompetes are such a bad idea, why are they so common? I'm not saying that their ubiquity makes them a good idea. I'm asking why nobody has gotten around to starting a company that avoids using them, and then gotten lots of great developers who work for less money because their freedom is maximized. If I found out that every landlord in my city enforced that rule, I would work hundred-hour weeks raising the money to buy an apartment that didn't enforce the rule, knowing I could charge a huge premium and get lots of residents.
As I've said in other contexts, most complaints about a purely capitalist system can be boiled down to a business plan -- and if nobody has done it, and you won't do it, what does that say about your complaint?
- michaelkeenan 18y agoIf noncompetes are such a bad idea, why are they so common? It could be a Prisoner's Dilemma where everyone's defecting (a similar situation to hockey players voting for a rule mandating helmet usage, but not using them without the rule: http://www.econport.org/content/teaching/modules/NFG/Hockey.html http://www.econport.org/content/teaching/modules/NFG/Hockey....). That said, I agree with you that there should not be laws about what contracts you can make. There's been plenty of harm from that.