4 ms·
The legal precedent isn't that Apple doesn't have a monopoly. There is no legal precedent on whether Apple has a monopoly. The law is entirely agnostic on whet
by angus-prune 5y ago
The legal precedent isn't that Apple doesn't have a monopoly.
There is no legal precedent on whether Apple has a monopoly. The law is entirely agnostic on whether Apple has a monopoly until it is put to a judge.
- macintux 5y agoThere is no legal precedent I’m aware of that you can carve out one company’s products and claim that constitutes a market over which it holds a monopoly, in the presence of an alternative with comparable market share.
- catgary 5y agoConsoles have existed for decades applying similar rules to software distribution, no?