3 ms·
Yeah, right, that’s what I considered “acceptable” for such a fun-only functionality, I guess. Not that it would be too surprising, since the behavior is a gen
by mormegil 5y ago
Yeah, right, that’s what I considered “acceptable” for such a fun-only functionality, I guess.
Not that it would be too surprising, since the behavior is a general property of the (ermph… Laplace? Poisson? oh, whatever) distribution, right? Still, I made this histogram for the real probabilities of Wikipedia articles (for enwiki and my home cswiki) and it turned out to look the same (meaning the random number generator is not obviously superbad), see https://gist.github.com/mormegil-cz/84d0cc34eb5f1234be8966f7c5498d9c https://gist.github.com/mormegil-cz/84d0cc34eb5f1234be8966f7...