I guess the accusation of superficiality is warranted if Sal is expected to weigh in with value judgements and instead he takes a hands-off approach. I think ma

I guess the accusation of superficiality is warranted if Sal is expected to weigh in with value judgements and instead he takes a hands-off approach. I think many of the soft-science topics ( econ, finance ) etc. aren't as value-neutral as two plus three equals five hardcore math. eg. http://www.khanacademy.org/video/is-short-selling-bad?playlist=Finance http://www.khanacademy.org/video/is-short-selling-bad?playli... The above video is supposed to be a discussion of virtues and vices of short-selling, but depending on who you are, you will tend to read it differently, because its impossible to be value neutral on that topic. Here's another one: http://www.khanacademy.org/video/are-hedge-funds-bad?playlist=Finance http://www.khanacademy.org/video/are-hedge-funds-bad?playlis... I guess finance geeks such as myself will find the question "Are hedge funds bad" itself a nonsense question. Its like asking "Is recursion bad ?". Unless you qualify it with more metrics, such as "bad to whom/what", what is "bad", as opposed to what is "good" etc.