3 ms·
I think it’s the “harmful” rhetoric that signals “I have an agenda”. We really need to get passed this charged way of conveying perfectly valid feedback. Becaus
by listless 5y ago
I think it’s the “harmful” rhetoric that signals “I have an agenda”. We really need to get passed this charged way of conveying perfectly valid feedback. Because come on. It’s a chat app.
- kevingadd 5y agoOf course they have an agenda. Discord is harder for them to use now, and they want it fixed. When did "agenda" become a negatively charged concept that only bad actors possess? Slack and Teams are chat apps too. Why would chat apps not be important?
- kodah 5y agoUsing emotionally charged language is usually pretty off-putting. Some people are used to using emotionally charged language any time they feel some way, but I think that ends up wearing people down for when they hear it in the future. That's probably why you have so many people here commenting about the use of "harm".
- listless 5y agoBy “agenda” I meant it in the sense that this isn’t about accessibility as much as it is this person getting points for a call out. That’s a bad faith interpretation. So not presenting that as irrefutable fact.