4 ms·
It would also disrupt food, drinking water and sweage. And all transportation, so even fuel would not be available. Without clean water and sanitation at home c
by madia_leva 5y ago
It would also disrupt food, drinking water and sweage. And all transportation, so even fuel would not be available. Without clean water and sanitation at home cities would be death traps.
People living on an area with rivers and wild animals could do a bit better. Unless they are at reach of people walking out of the cities.
Think about a zombie apocalypse, but with starving people by the hundreds of thousands. Starving and, if in the US, armed.
Keeping food and water at home for at least for a couple of months is a very sensitive thing to do for this kind of events. Think about a new pandemic but this time the virus has 10% or 20% of mortality. Exactly.
- JoeAltmaier 5y agoIt makes sense to keep food and water, only if you also have protection. I mean a weapon. Because those 20 million zombies are coming.
- jjeaff 5y agoIt only makes sense to have protection if you are going to have enough protection to fend off all 20 million of those zombies.
- SyzygistSix 5y agoThat is what community is for. I would imagine an armed community would be in a better situation than an unarmed community or unarmed individuals.
- madia_leva 5y agoI would say that's what the State the ultimate community) is for (police, army but also judges, doctors, laws requiring companies to implement the required safewards, ...), but I'm European, so I guess we simply see the world in very different ways.
- JoeAltmaier 5y agoThe premise is, the State is gone. What then?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]