3 ms·
Look at another aspect. There's the work aspect: the lucky fellow who was paid $11k/month for creating one PR and two issues. There's also management/overfiew a
by Arnt 6y ago
Look at another aspect. There's the work aspect: the lucky fellow who was paid $11k/month for creating one PR and two issues. There's also management/overfiew aspect: the organisation that didn't notice that it was paying.
If the organisation (I realise it's just a few people) were paying enough attet6ion to notice that it was paying for ~nothing, then it's a fair assumption that it would also be paying enough attention to its sponsors.
- perryizgr8 6y agoDefinitely it is very surprising that they continued to pay despite there being close to zero output. If I tried this in my company I'd have a PIP in 2 months and probably get fired in another 2.
- akmittal 6y agoMost people pay because babel is useful and they want to support the project. Funds going to wrong hands is different deal.
- perryizgr8 6y agoI meant the org should have stopped paying an employee if he didn't work.
- Arnt 5y agoPerhaps, but that seems rather destructive. A more constructive approach would have been to pay attention to the sponsors.