> While the Carrington Event has long been considered a once‐in‐a‐century catastrophe That seems dismissive of "once‐in‐a‐century" risks. We can't ignore "once

> While the Carrington Event has long been considered a once‐in‐a‐century catastrophe That seems dismissive of "once‐in‐a‐century" risks. We can't ignore "once‐in‐a‐century" risks? We're currently suffering though COVID-19, a "once‐in‐a‐century" pandemic. "once‐in‐a‐century" is not the same as "unique" either. They cite several examples ... across several centuries. So what are they saying is the re-appraised frequency - once every 75 years?