2 ms·
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point (or maybe this is your point), but doesn't this take effectively invalidate the entire human interviewing process? The who
by culturestate 5y ago
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point (or maybe this is your point), but doesn't this take effectively invalidate the entire human interviewing process? The whole thing is just a series of actions (portfolio review, phone screen, whatever) that give the reviwer(s) a set of mostly subjective data points from which they infer a candidate's fit for a particular role.
- tomnipotent 5y agoI've had plenty of recruiters that could ignore silly resume mistakes and find gem candidates. I've also hired candidates with horrible resumes, and it's never been a problem. Evaluate a candidate based on their experience and qualifications, everything else is just to satisfy our own egos.
- culturestate 5y ago> Evaluate a candidate based on their experience and qualifications Well, as I said I typically hire in design and product, so "proven ability to produce high-quality written content" is often an important qualification.
- EvilEy3 5y ago> I've also hired candidates with horrible resumes, and it's never been a problem. That's as much survivorship bias as it is to hire someone based on their attention to details.