4 ms·
So you are saying in the absence of evidence they claimed that there was no driver and they have no reason to correct that misinformation?
by adolph 6y ago
So you are saying in the absence of evidence they claimed that there was no driver and they have no reason to correct that misinformation?
- Jordrok 6y agoYou do realize that it was the police who originally stated that there was no driver?
- adolph 6y agoWhy would a serious publication take statements of the police at face value much less as evidence of anything? > It was "strongly implied" because no one was in the driver's seat. Now there is evidence there was a driver, after an investigation. Why should they retract anything? A publication which does not retract or correct misinformation is a key part of the problem.