I feel like this manifest seriously lacks the part where it should be playing devil's advocate. I don't have a say in this matter, and I don't know if the autho

I feel like this manifest seriously lacks the part where it should be playing devil's advocate. I don't have a say in this matter, and I don't know if the author is right anyway. But let's suppose that whoever pushes this agenda indeed is mistaken, and that he's not acting malevolently, and just doesn't see something that the author sees: I'm pretty sure he has some ideas why NIS 2 is necessary. If so, listing (quite speculative) counter-arguments without addressing why "pro-"arguments aren't necessarily correct isn't very convincing. So: why the proponents of this proposal (supposedly) think it's necessary, and why they are mistaken and it actually isn't?