Luckily Postgres' autovacuum works really well in normal workloads. If there's an even mix of inserts spread throughout time then it's probably best to just rel

Luckily Postgres' autovacuum works really well in normal workloads. If there's an even mix of inserts spread throughout time then it's probably best to just rely on it. For data warehouses inserts can happen in bulk on a regular cadence. In that case it can help to vacuum right after. I'm not sure if it has a huge impact in practice.