3 ms·
$1000 says he isn't.
by crucialfelix 5y ago
$1000 says he isn't.
- satvikpendem 5y agoMaybe. Looks like the OP says his books are pretty good with high ratings and a high volume of ratings as well, so they must be enjoyable enough to the people who buy them.
- dotBen 5y agoSelection bias. People who see OP's books in the search results and conclude it's a shitty book/something is off/etc are not going to leave a review (on a book they didn't buy) to say so. People who spend $10 and 4hrs of their time are inclined to not want to feel like they just wasted that and so will positively review something to reinforce.
- w0de0 5y agoI’m sure we can trust the self publisher of a ghostwritten unedited cost-first keyword-selected book to never employ fake reviews. He’s only here to provide what’s best for his customer.
- satvikpendem 5y agoThat's pretty disingenuous to say they employ fake reviews, regardless of whatever your opinions of self publishing are.
- z3ncyberpunk 5y agoBut true
- chwitters 5y agoWhy is it disingenuous? They've literally described a process optimised to produce "passive income" with absolutely no quality control at all.
- Zanni 5y agoAt 3 cents/word, not only is the ghostwriter not an expert, they probably aren't even a good writer. That's less than what a decent typist would charge for material that's already written (transcribing from audio or handwritten manuscript).