3 ms·
Unions can at the least increase the standard of pay for everyone other than those few top performers who also know how to negotiate well. Having to adversaria
by wcarss 5y ago
Unions can at the least increase the standard of pay for everyone other than those few top performers who also know how to negotiate well.
Having to adversarially game out every interaction just to thrive in the world, especially those interactions with entities that have a lot of power to make your life good or bad for a long time, is a serious burden to place on people, and unions can help to alleviate it.
I have also seen and read about the significant disparities in different demographic groups' (e.g. gender) willingness to do things like negotiate, and it can result in broad differences in outcomes.
(There's a lot of ways to work on that kind of issue, and I'm not necessarily trying to claim "unions" is the only or the best one, but they can help to mitigate problems of pay disparity.)
- HWR_14 5y agoUnions also increase the standard pay for the few top performers. If you are worth 10x a standard programmer, than the average programmer salary doubling doubles your value too. Most unions that represent jobs with vastly different skill levels raise the rate of everyone. Unions don't necessarily eliminate pay disparity, but they work for increased worker benefits in total.
- dv_dt 5y agoAnd by seriously enforcing minimums and medians, they can negotiate rules that don't impact out top performers - doubtful that SAG rules limits top actor pay for example.