8 ms·
Why would you re-read them when you could read something new? Do you find you're actually getting a significant amount of value or joy from it the second time a
by arsome 5y ago
Why would you re-read them when you could read something new? Do you find you're actually getting a significant amount of value or joy from it the second time around?
I ask because I think a good portion of the reason I enjoy software development is the absolute and total hatred I have for repetition in my life.
- SamoyedFurFluff 5y agoFor some highly complex books, a reread is more like a re-analysis of the text based off of ones existing knowledge. There will be nuances and details that were missed the first go around, that is uncovered the second time around, making the understanding of the piece richer. It’s like mathematics- everything is built on fundamentals. (Some people also derive comfort in familiar stories.)
- iNate2000 5y ago1. It’s totally easy to miss things when reading: certainly little delightful details, or even whole ideas or plot points. 2. It’s not like there are millions of great books out there. Some entertaining ones, some informative ones, a few that are both, and a very few life changers.
- psyc 5y agoMore than 90% of things that are new to me disappoint me. I don’t know how to find new things, especially fiction, with the expectation that it will hold my interest. Whereas something new from my favorite author has much better odds, and rereading my favorite novel is a sure thing.
- phaemon 5y agoWell, to your first point, because I value depth over novelty. The second time should be better. To your second point, to quote Prince, "There is joy in repetition".