4 ms·

Re-reading Pop-Psy and Airport literature is not the recommended reading. How about reading Hayek, Strauss for second time? How about reading man's search for m

Re-reading Pop-Psy and Airport literature is not the recommended reading. How about reading Hayek, Strauss for second time? How about reading man's search for meaning for the third time? You re-read great works, not NYT best shiller! (sic).

teucris 5y ago
Quite an assumption to make about those that don’t like to re-read books. I love reading, I’m very picky about the books I read, and yet I find I’m only re-reading a small handful of books, many years after I last read them. What am I to read in the mean time?
- sremani 5y ago
  I had to make some assumptions - given the OP said they did not see any value in re-reading. Not every thing is a candidate for re-read, for the fact of the matter 90% of airport literature is not worth single read let alone re-read. Take any good from my post and leave the rest. I am not the most finesse commentator.. but at least I am not accusatory.
canadianfella 5y ago
Gatekeeper
arsome 5y ago
Why would you re-read them when you could read something new? Do you find you're actually getting a significant amount of value or joy from it the second time around? I ask because I think a good portion of the reason I enjoy software development is the absolute and total hatred I have for repetition in my life.
- SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
  For some highly complex books, a reread is more like a re-analysis of the text based off of ones existing knowledge. There will be nuances and details that were missed the first go around, that is uncovered the second time around, making the understanding of the piece richer. It’s like mathematics- everything is built on fundamentals. (Some people also derive comfort in familiar stories.)
- iNate2000 5y ago
  1. It’s totally easy to miss things when reading: certainly little delightful details, or even whole ideas or plot points. 2. It’s not like there are millions of great books out there. Some entertaining ones, some informative ones, a few that are both, and a very few life changers.
- psyc 5y ago
  More than 90% of things that are new to me disappoint me. I don’t know how to find new things, especially fiction, with the expectation that it will hold my interest. Whereas something new from my favorite author has much better odds, and rereading my favorite novel is a sure thing.
- phaemon 5y ago
  Well, to your first point, because I value depth over novelty. The second time should be better. To your second point, to quote Prince, "There is joy in repetition".

teucris 5y ago

Quite an assumption to make about those that don’t like to re-read books. I love reading, I’m very picky about the books I read, and yet I find I’m only re-reading a small handful of books, many years after I last read them. What am I to read in the mean time?

sremani 5y ago
I had to make some assumptions - given the OP said they did not see any value in re-reading. Not every thing is a candidate for re-read, for the fact of the matter 90% of airport literature is not worth single read let alone re-read. Take any good from my post and leave the rest. I am not the most finesse commentator.. but at least I am not accusatory.

canadianfella 5y ago

Gatekeeper

arsome 5y ago

Why would you re-read them when you could read something new? Do you find you're actually getting a significant amount of value or joy from it the second time around? I ask because I think a good portion of the reason I enjoy software development is the absolute and total hatred I have for repetition in my life.

SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
For some highly complex books, a reread is more like a re-analysis of the text based off of ones existing knowledge. There will be nuances and details that were missed the first go around, that is uncovered the second time around, making the understanding of the piece richer. It’s like mathematics- everything is built on fundamentals. (Some people also derive comfort in familiar stories.)
iNate2000 5y ago
1. It’s totally easy to miss things when reading: certainly little delightful details, or even whole ideas or plot points. 2. It’s not like there are millions of great books out there. Some entertaining ones, some informative ones, a few that are both, and a very few life changers.
psyc 5y ago
More than 90% of things that are new to me disappoint me. I don’t know how to find new things, especially fiction, with the expectation that it will hold my interest. Whereas something new from my favorite author has much better odds, and rereading my favorite novel is a sure thing.
phaemon 5y ago
Well, to your first point, because I value depth over novelty. The second time should be better. To your second point, to quote Prince, "There is joy in repetition".