I can't assess the quality of PNAS, but the one thing I remember about it is that Columbia statistics prof Andrew Gelman disses them all the time for peddling p

I can't assess the quality of PNAS, but the one thing I remember about it is that Columbia statistics prof Andrew Gelman disses them all the time for peddling pseudo-science based mostly on junk statistics[1]. He paints it as basically a science oriented clickbait tabloid. [1] https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/?s=PNAS https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/?s=PNAS, https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2017/10/04/breaking-pnas-changes-slogan/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2017/10/04/breaking-p...