3 ms·
So I'm obviously not a monk but I've known some and that doesn't surprise me too much. Outside of some orders that highly value education, I think monastic lif
by 8fGTBjZxBcHq 5y ago
So I'm obviously not a monk but I've known some and that doesn't surprise me too much.
Outside of some orders that highly value education, I think monastic life generally discourages knowing things for the sake of knowing them.
The political origins of a monastic order are not spiritually or theologically significant to a monk in that order really. Like sure they should know but I can imagine how it would come about that one would not.
- guerrilla 5y agoThat's a bit of an ironic take considering medieval science and philosophy...
- 8fGTBjZxBcHq 5y agoI don't think their weighing of learning has changed just social needs changed around it. "Able to read the Bible" was considered important for monks so they were literate. It still is, but now everyone else is literate too so it's not notable anymore.
- guerrilla 5y agoI think you should look into what medieval monks have done for science and philosophy. It wasn't just that they were literate. You're very much underestimating that.