3 ms·
>> What's good for one user may be bad for another I bought 3 "identical" old Dell T3610 workstations off eBay for a home lab project. They have "identical" st
by CraigJPerry 5y ago
>> What's good for one user may be bad for another
I bought 3 "identical" old Dell T3610 workstations off eBay for a home lab project. They have "identical" striped HDDs in them.
Kicking off a Fedora Core OS install on all 3 simultaneously (which i've had to do a few times as i learned how ignition works) results in the same ordering of the hosts finishing their rebuilds -
Machine 2 always finishes first by around 3 minutes of a 14 min wipe & reinstall process.
Machine 3 finishes ahead of machine 1 by around 45 seconds or so usually.
Almost 5 minutes in a <20 mins process, that's huge! I still don't actually know the root cause. Benchmarking disk I/O has them within a few percent of each other. It's not that they're contending to remotely load the OS installer - that gets cached in memory at the start. There's a few seconds difference in the UEFI bios startup timings but none of them are particularly consistent which is weird, i would have thought UEFI init time would be the same on a given host each boot, but there's a few seconds in it each time.
- userbinator 5y agoThere's a few seconds difference in the UEFI bios startup timings Could that be anything to do with the Intel ME or similar "management" spyware/etc. trying to phone home or do something? You may have to reflash the BIOS to "clean" that completely. The other thing I can think of is that the CPU heatsinks aren't clogged with the same amount of dust and causing one machine to thermally throttle more than the others.
- xen2xen1 5y agoThermals are probably the right answer.
- bentcorner 5y agoThat's interesting. If you're curious, swapping disks might tell you more. If it's thermals like other commenters have suggested then you won't see a difference. (unless you knock some loose!)
- bityard 5y agoI used to work at a web hosting company and one of my responsibilities was managing all the VPS backups. We had a few racks for "backup servers" which were all identical boxes. We would provision CentOS on them two or three at a time and I observed the exact same thing. Some servers were always just a little faster than others. Never figured out why.