> Dr. Compton said the committee’s dismissal of cases over time validated its methodology. What? This makes no sense. That some of the accusations have been pr

> Dr. Compton said the committee’s dismissal of cases over time validated its methodology. What? This makes no sense. That some of the accusations have been proven incorrect doesn’t mean the remaining accusations must not also be incorrect. If a doctor has a documented history of falsely diagnosing a patient with X and that doctor diagnoses you with X should you get a second opinion? Or take it at face value because the doctor has “validated their (clearly flawed) methodology”?