10 ms·
It's supposed to be provocative to potentially stoke introspection. I understand the rationale behind "safe spaces", that wasn't my question.
by vmception 6y ago
It's supposed to be provocative to potentially stoke introspection.
I understand the rationale behind "safe spaces", that wasn't my question.
- Barrin92 6y agowell it's not provocative, it's just stupid. The whole "oh safe spaces? See you're the real racist!" thing you can find in the youtube comment section of Ben Shapiro videos. You're not making some genius point here, you're just not familiar with the kind of experiences women face in these environments or lack the social intelligence to imagine it, like 95% of the HN audience.
- vmception 6y agoyour words and I’m not familiar with those influencers Is the way they are addressing it compatible with existing laws? Do you see how easy that is for me to have zero emotion on this, your turn. Think of it as a standardized test question, you have to answer those based on accuracy.
- Barrin92 6y ago>Is the way they are addressing it compatible with existing laws? Obviously. Private, gender separated clubs exist everywhere in the United States. Ever been to a sports club or a fraternity? Civil rights legislation addresses employment and 'spaces of public accommodation'. You're obviously JAQing off because you know this
- ummonk 6y agoCalifornia has legislation that goes beyond national legislation.