3 ms·

I have a really hard time taking this kind of "analysis" seriously. It does not seems rigorous or scientific at all, and I don't understand how it can be visib

• emdubbelyou 5y ago
  If you’re going to post a comment of skepticism, please try to support your argument with actual criticism. Currently, all I have is your opinion on the article, which is in contrast to the # of people who upvoted the post. I can easily say that I DO think the article is rigorous and scientific but then we’d disagree without any insight into what we disagree on.
  • stephc_int13 5y ago
    I did that on purpose, simply to voice my opinion. Let's say I vote to see less article like this one on HN. This is merely annoying, not enough to warrant a full debunk.
  • hawthornio 5y ago
    In my view, an article that makes claims in the natural sciences published on “some person’s blog” is not really worth considering as a scientific work.