I would say that's almost more disagreeable than conscientious. Conscientious can almost be better described as 'consistent', 'doing what you say you're gong t

I would say that's almost more disagreeable than conscientious. Conscientious can almost be better described as 'consistent', 'doing what you say you're gong to do', 'being responsible'. I think you might be hinting at the right thing ... .. but 'weighing evidence in a very highly deliberative, judicial fashion' - might not be the best example of that. Extolling the Judgment, might even land on the disagreeable side. For example, the Judge who finds a supposed murderer 'not guilty' even with the mobs of people chanting 'guilty' outside the courthouse. I don't think 'disagreeableness' is necessarily even the right word, it's more like 'will have their own opinion even if it makes them unpopular'. I almost think that those Big 5 could be reoriented in a way that divides people as those inclined towards populist outcomes vs. those inclined towards judicial, principled, truthful ones.