So there's also the the (naive?) assumption that when you see an important perspective missing and you are a scientist you feel the motivation to address it and

So there's also the the (naive?) assumption that when you see an important perspective missing and you are a scientist you feel the motivation to address it and perhaps write a book. >> ...or decide wronh the risk is significant. This sounds exactly the same as what he is saying, i.e. getting trillion dollar decisions wrong. >> - Pollution is pollution. This just isn't true. We have limited resources and need to prioritize them to tackle the issues with the biggest return. This is in the best interest of the people who want change and the people who pay for it, even if they're not the same groups.