I'm not even arguing against git, what are you talking about? I'm only pointing out how the Linux kernel development is the only project (except maybe some GNU

I'm not even arguing against git, what are you talking about? I'm only pointing out how the Linux kernel development is the only project (except maybe some GNU projects) that still insists on using archaic stuff, like sending email with patches. And if fact I remember reading about a maintainer of a GNU project which I don't remember the name renting about how he's pretty much the only maintaining the project. There's also a project to get people up and running to contribute the kernel code base, most people stops at the email stuff. It's not like those things do not have tangible consequences. And so far I've never seen good counterarguments except snark and logical fallacies in the form of "it always been that way" and "just start your own" which only reinforces my point about toxic leaders.