> everything was resolved satisfactorily What part of "our fix was not accepted" do you deem as "resolved satisfactory". I provided you with a broad context an

> everything was resolved satisfactorily What part of "our fix was not accepted" do you deem as "resolved satisfactory". I provided you with a broad context and a reference to the original discussion that clearly shows there was opposition against a practical solution and a lack of promised fix on the hw-side, and you still have the audacity to say it was "resolved". The patch was not accepted into the mainline, so please explain what you mean when you say the problem was resolved? Resolved how? This is exactly what drives practitioners like myself away from contributing to the kernel.