3 ms·
"There's an argument about whether viruses are 'alive', since they depend on others' cells to make their proteins. Prions are even less considered 'alive' ..."
by rsync 5y ago
"There's an argument about whether viruses are 'alive', since they depend on others' cells to make their proteins. Prions are even less considered 'alive' ..."
I have read several proposals for a "viral LUCA" in the past ... does anyone ever suggest a prion LUCA[1] ?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_universal_common_ancestor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_universal_common_ancestor
- teachingassist 5y ago> does anyone ever suggest a prion LUCA[1] Yes, it totally makes sense to talk about a common ancestor! There's one known prion-disease-causing protein in humans, the "major prion protein". You can see the gene containing the code for this protein in human DNA, and any mammal DNA has a similar gene that is still very closely related. This suggests that the protein has some important function(s) in mammals, and has a common ancestor before these species existed. Genes that have a shared history but are less closely related (and don't appear to cause disease) can be found for example also in zebrafish ('Shadoo' gene) and in humans ('Doppel' gene). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15449459/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15449459/