3 ms·
Actually, I would say 18th century was definitely quite happening. Yes, we did not see much GDP growth. However, this was a century where tides shifted. While t
by accurrent 5y ago
Actually, I would say 18th century was definitely quite happening. Yes, we did not see much GDP growth. However, this was a century where tides shifted. While the Mughal empire and Qing Dynasty accounting for probably 55% of the world's GDP at the start of the century by the end of the century we see Europe dominating the whole world (the Mughal Empire was taken over by the British and the seeds of the opium war were being sown by the end of the century). The 18th century is also probably the first time when we see the entire world as a single unit. Thanks to advances in sailing, European traders were all over the place. In the 1750s we see what is probably the first world scale conflict with the Seven Year War. For the first time in human History politics in one continent affects the politics of another continent. The fact is the world was changing faster than ever before in the 18th century. I'm pretty sure its hard not to feel the winds of change if you were alive at the time.
- BobbyJo 5y agoIt would look dynamic to an omnipotent being, but I think your parent comment was referring to the experience of an average human. Pretty much everyone on the planet at that time died living much the same life as their parents and grandparents.
- accurrent 5y agoI would say thats qiite a eurocentric view. Many Asians would have been plunged into poverty. Entire industries essentially disappeared with the coming of the British (muslin, wootz steel) and new industries would be formed (opium, indigo). They would also have faced a a vastly different set of rules.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- BobbyJo 5y agoMy impression is that the point would apply to those countries as well. The vast majority of people, even in those countries, lived just as their parents and grandparents.