3 ms·
Replying here due to max comment depth tree, to explain in more detail. About the link between boole's and bell's inequalities : There are tons of paper : A q
by GistNoesis 5y ago
Replying here due to max comment depth tree, to explain in more detail.
About the link between boole's and bell's inequalities : There are tons of paper : A quick search for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0406004.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0406004.pdf (I just skimmed it for a few seconds but it's probably talking about the right thing)
In the paper you suggest https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949 https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949, there is nothing which looks like a probability definition.
Assuming the world is using continuous fields, defining the probability for what register as a discrete event like a "blip" must be done carefully, it's not a trivial thing.
Otherwise when you are taking joint probabilities and condition probability, it just tells you that those are questions you can't ask.
- eigenket 5y agoAh yeah, I went to skim the Pitowsky reference. I forgot that people call (what I was taught as) Bonferroni inequalities Boole's inequalities. I'm still not sure what probability distribution (or measure) you want to be defined in that paper. Experimentalists generally don't assume any probability distribution in advance, I am not sure why they would need to in this case.