> Hossenfelder has some very strongly held negative views on how resources in the physics community should be allocated If you advocate that A (for example, a

> Hossenfelder has some very strongly held negative views on how resources in the physics community should be allocated If you advocate that A (for example, a large telescope) should be funded instead of B (for example, a particle collider), because you estimate A to be more fruitful, it's not a negative view. It's just a view. You must be pretty strongly in the particle collider camp, if you view funding telescopes as a negative view.