4 ms·
MWI people keep making these strong claims and ignoring the very credible criticism of them. https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-the-many-worlds-interpretation-
by TheOtherHobbes 6y ago
MWI people keep making these strong claims and ignoring the very credible criticism of them.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-the-many-worlds-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics-has-many-problems-20181018/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-the-many-worlds-interpret...
- ZeroGravitas 6y agoThat's a very philosophical rather than physics-based rebuttal. He appears to be saying it can't be true because it would make life/and or the concept of self meaningless. Whereas I would say that a theory that suggests we are meaningless temporary blips in an infinite universe is probably a much greater indication that it is true than otherwise.
- fsh 6y agoMost interpretations of QM make identical predictions for the outcome of any possible experiment. This makes the field fundamentally philosophical rather than scientific.
- AgentME 6y agoI previously found this article and wrote a bunch of notes about it that I never got around to posting before. It was too long to be an HN comment so I've just cleaned it up and posted it here: https://macil.tech/2021/05/09/bad-mwi-criticism/ https://macil.tech/2021/05/09/bad-mwi-criticism/. I'm not a big fan of the article, it mostly just defines self in a nonsense way and then treats it as a contradiction with MWI despite also laying out more sensible answers.