There's a fair bit of flamebait in the article, but the two lists of points he raises are not trivial. He's a bit like Erik Naggum used to be in that respect,

There's a fair bit of flamebait in the article, but the two lists of points he raises are not trivial. He's a bit like Erik Naggum used to be in that respect, with a lower signal to noise ratio. The article is not incoherent and does reward the sceptical reader. I hope posting it here was useful to at least some HN readers. More on the Kulisz phenomenon: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?RichardKulisz http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?RichardKulisz