> "Corporations are people." That is a useful legal fiction only because saying otherwise infringes on the rights of the people within those corporations. It i

> "Corporations are people." That is a useful legal fiction only because saying otherwise infringes on the rights of the people within those corporations. It is not useful for dictating public policy for billions of people. > To continue to demand 'free speech' to mean that anything private, individual resident or company service, must continue to allow you to say what you want to say within somebody else's space is morally offensive to me. This assumes that freedom of speech is a positive right. It's not. It's a negative right. We are not asking Apple or Google to speak, we are asking them not to censor. There is a difference.