3 ms·

This guy appears to be a well-known troll, which is supported by the incoherent nature of this article and the rest of his blog: http://let.sysops.be/wiki/Rich

• masklinn 15y ago
  The article reminds me of Xah Lee's production: there seems to be kernels of truth scattered all over, but they're embedded in a great morass of nonsense, contradictions, insanity and downright trolling. I liked his declaration of 8 exceptions, followed by the listing of 9 items.
• chalst 15y ago
  There's a fair bit of flamebait in the article, but the two lists of points he raises are not trivial. He's a bit like Erik Naggum used to be in that respect, with a lower signal to noise ratio. The article is not incoherent and does reward the sceptical reader. I hope posting it here was useful to at least some HN readers. More on the Kulisz phenomenon: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?RichardKulisz http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?RichardKulisz