3 ms·
The only reason they do that is because they are trying to break into Steam's near monopoly market position. They are not above anti-consumer practices like exc
by dtech 5y ago
The only reason they do that is because they are trying to break into Steam's near monopoly market position. They are not above anti-consumer practices like exclusives. I have no doubt that if they could, they would take that 30% cut.
- MattRix 5y agoWhy would they choose 12% and not 25% or 20% then? Either of those would be better than Steam. Calling exclusives “anti-consumer” is basically nonsense. Exclusives have been a mainstay of the gaming world for ages. The actual harm they cause to the consumer is minimal, no different than first party titles do (like Valve’s own Half-Life, etc).
- scarface74 5y ago5% less isn’t enough to get over the inertia of being on steam.