4 ms·

So? The question isn't if it's better than some utopian ideal situation but if it's better than what we have now. If your approach to things is the former then

So? The question isn't if it's better than some utopian ideal situation but if it's better than what we have now. If your approach to things is the former then every solution to every problem will fall short and nothing will ever change.

RGamma 6y ago
In general I agree with "incremental progress is better than none". However this problem is not of a technological nature but a political/institutional one. If there had been a strong forward-looking consensus to keep agricultural ecosystem use in check, it would never have come to this point. As so often the free market moves first, society gets to clean up afterwards.