4 ms·
> Schiller and the other people receiving the email wanted to figure out how to shore up its protections in light of their discovery that the static analyzer Ap
by Jyaif 5y ago
> Schiller and the other people receiving the email wanted to figure out how to shore up its protections in light of their discovery that the static analyzer Apple used wasn’t effective against the newly discovered method.
Yes, I totally believe that Apple did not know about NSInvocation and the half a dozen other ways to dynamically call methods.
- kevinh 5y agoThe email is linked there and you can read it. Just because one team at Apple is aware of potential vulnerabilities doesn't mean that everyone at the company is equally aware.
- stephc_int13 5y agoTop management is responsible, lack of technical competence or knowledge is not valid defense. This is their job to know.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- IntelMiner 5y agoAs loathe as I am to defend Apple on any points Top management isn't there to act as some infinite well of knowledge, they're there to speak about issues that have been distilled down to them on a higher level with other relevant teams What you're effectively saying is that Apple's "VP of Software" or something not knowing every line of source code in IOS is "not a valid defense"
- stephc_int13 5y agoWhat I am saying is that in a general sense, in any hierarchical organisation, the boss has largest part of the responsibility share, no matter what. And then top management etc.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]