4 ms·
Epic is certainly not anti-monopoly. And Apple is actually trashing them in court because of that. For example Apple lawyer asked if Epic would have accepted
by speeder 5y ago
Epic is certainly not anti-monopoly.
And Apple is actually trashing them in court because of that.
For example Apple lawyer asked if Epic would have accepted a deal where Apple maintained the current ecosystem but let Epic have an exception... Epic said yes.
At another point Apple asked difference between them, Xbox, Switch, etc..., Epic said that because consoles are sold at loss they having a monopoly is fine... so that is a bad argument if you are trying to prove you are anti-monopoly.
And this goes on and on...
Then there is the fact Epic paid 1 billion USD to developers not sell in other stores, including in some cases to break contracts to do so (for example kickstarted games, that promised Steam delivery, and then told the people that paid them that it would be Epic only and there would be no refunds).
- aranelsurion 5y agoSounds like OP meant this case is anti-monopoly, not Epic itself.
- hajile 5y agoEpic doesn’t have to convince the jury that they’re innocent or even not despicable. They only need to convince the jury that Apple is doing bad things.