"Still, it bothers me when it says "logged in" in the google bar at the top because google watches my searches." I think Facebook does the same - or at least a

"Still, it bothers me when it says "logged in" in the google bar at the top because google watches my searches." I think Facebook does the same - or at least attempts to, through the use of cookies (via embedded apps, and the Facebook comment system). -- I think it's about time Facebook had some serious competition - and I'm hoping that Google+ could provide a good alternative. In relation to the Myspace, Facebook provided an iterative progression. Since its introduction, social networking has obviously become so much more important. I think it's far more difficult for Facebook to iteratively change the paradigm its developed because its users aren't used to change. User re-education is difficult. From what I've read, Google+ is going to offer some valuable features missing from Facebook. The circle idea appeals a lot - and I like the sense that the platform seems to be geared as one tool in a suite of social utilities, rather than an all encompassing monolith. -- "Circles? Actually I think that many people like the idea of their posts are being read by as many people as possible and not just the ones with similar interests [..]" I don't agree - some people might want everyone to read their posts, but I think that's a small subset of the general population. Re. your example; on the flip-side, I think an awful lot of the non-techies will quickly get bored of hearing about about Android API woes. Circles will provide them with a way to choose, and choice is something which is almost universally lauded.