> despite no evidence in that direction :) Is this a joke? Anyways, the entitlement Uber had was one thing, it'd be another if they had passed approval whil

> despite no evidence in that direction :) Is this a joke? Anyways, the entitlement Uber had was one thing, it'd be another if they had passed approval while using the entitlement. Afaik it was used for an Apple Watch demo. No one ever found evidence of its use in the main app. It wasn't an entitlement for recording a screen, it was an entitlement for low level graphics access that could then be abused to do so. Had they actually used the entitlement to record screens it'd be one thing, and I take exception with unfair treatment of devs like this, but please. Actually implying Apple has taken 100x the steps of their nearest competitor to maintain privacy on the most used computing devices...